A+ Content September 21, 2026 · 16 min read

Amazon A+ Content Examples: 25 Teardowns by Category

Twenty-five A+ layouts across twelve categories, each broken into three things: the module order, the headline pattern, and the objection every module was built to answer. Copy the structure and design the pixels yourself.

25 Layouts Torn Down
12 Product Categories
7 Module Slots Per A+ Page
3 Patterns That Show Up In All 25
Quick Answer

The A+ pages that convert share a structure regardless of category: a full-width opener that restates the promise from the title, two to three modules that each answer one specific objection in the order shoppers raise them, a proof module (comparison chart, specs, or how-to-use) near the bottom, and one closing module that tells the shopper what to buy or how to use it. Category decides which objections come first. Supplements lead with trust and dosing. Kitchen leads with fit and cleanup. Pet leads with ingredients and the animal's reaction. Apparel leads with sizing. Electronics leads with compatibility. The 25 layouts below map that pattern across twelve categories so you can find the one closest to your product and copy its module order.

Nobody scrolls to A+ Content to learn what a product is. They already know. They scroll to find the reason not to buy it, and the pages that convert are the ones that answer that reason before it fully forms.

Most A+ galleries online show you pretty pages. That is the least useful way to study A+, because you cannot see why the modules are in that order, what the headline was doing, or what the designer was worried the shopper would think. This guide flips it. Every layout below is described by structure: which modules, in what order, with what kind of headline, answering which objection. The visual treatment is yours to design. The structure is what transfers.

Disclosure

Evolve Media Agency designs A+ Content for Amazon brands, and these 25 layouts come from pages we have built or audited, anonymized by category. That means we have an interest in you thinking A+ matters. It also means every layout here was tested against a real listing rather than lifted from a gallery. Section 12 covers when A+ is not the thing to spend money on.

A note on scope. The A+ Content guide covers eligibility, specs, module dimensions and the submission process. The Premium vs Standard decision framework covers whether you should be using Premium modules at all. This post assumes you know the basics and want to see how the pieces fit together on a real page.

01/12 Section

How To Read These Teardowns

Each layout is described in the same four lines so you can scan for the one that matches your product.

The Four Lines Of Every Teardown Same Format, All 25
Line 01
Module Order

The modules top to bottom, using Amazon's names. Standard A+ allows up to seven modules; most of these use four to six. Premium modules are labeled as such.

Line 02
Headline Pattern

The type of headline on each module: promise, proof, objection-flip, instruction or comparison. Not the words, which are yours to write.

Line 03
Objection Answered

The specific doubt the module exists to remove. If a module does not answer a doubt, it is decoration and should be cut.

Line 04
Why It Works

One line on the mechanism. Usually it is sequencing: the module appears where the shopper's attention is, right after the doubt forms.

Definition

Objection sequencing. Ordering A+ modules by the order in which shoppers raise doubts for that category, rather than by the order the brand wants to tell its story. The brand story belongs in the Brand Story module above A+; A+ itself is the place to answer questions. Most underperforming A+ pages have the modules in brand-story order.

One thing to notice across all 25: the first module is almost never a company logo or a "who we are" block. The first module restates the promise the shopper clicked on, in a full-width image with a short headline. The Brand Story module already covers who you are; using A+ slot one for it again wastes the only module every shopper sees.

02/12 Section

Supplements: Three Layouts

Supplements carry the heaviest objection load on Amazon: does it work, is it safe, is it real, how much do I take. They also carry the heaviest compliance load, which limits what a headline can say. The three layouts below handle the same objections with different module choices.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
01. Daily probioticImage Header with Text → Four Image & Text → Single Image with Specs Detail → Comparison Chart → Standard TextPromise → proof x4 → instruction → comparison → disclosureDoes it survive digestion; how many strains; when do I take it; which of your five do I buy
02. Magnesium sleep blendImage & Dark Text Overlay → Three Images & Text → Single Image & Highlights → Technical Specifications → Company LogoPromise → objection-flip x3 → proof → specs → trustWill it make me groggy; which form of magnesium; is it third-party tested; what is the dose per serving
03. Protein powder (Premium)Premium Full Image → Premium Hotspot → Premium Video → Premium Comparison Chart → Premium Q&APromise → proof → instruction → comparison → objection-flipWhat is in it; does it mix well; how does it taste; which flavor and size; is it safe for my diet

Why these work

Layout 01 puts the specs module fourth, after the four-image proof block. Shoppers who reach a specs panel before they are convinced the product works read the specs skeptically; shoppers who reach it after three or four proof points read it as confirmation. The same information in slot two underperformed in an A/B test on the same listing.

Layout 02 uses Three Images & Text as three objection-flips in a row: "Not the kind that upsets your stomach," "Not a sedative," "Not a proprietary blend." Each headline names the fear and denies it. Compliance review is easier on denials than on claims, which is part of why this structure is common in supplements. Layout 03 is the Premium version, where the Q&A module handles the diet and allergen questions that would otherwise clutter the Standard Text module. The supplements playbook covers the compliance side in depth.

03/12 Section

Skincare And Beauty: Three Layouts

Beauty shoppers want to see the product on skin, know the ingredients, and know it is for their skin type. Texture and application shots do more work here than in any other category, which is why the image-heavy modules dominate.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
04. Vitamin C serumImage Header with Text → Single Image & Sidebar → Four Image & Text → Multiple Image Module A → Comparison ChartPromise → proof → instruction x4 → texture gallery → comparisonIs it stable; what percentage; how do I layer it; what does it feel like; serum or moisturizer
05. Tallow balm (unscented)Image & Light Text Overlay → Three Images & Text → Single Image & Highlights → Standard Text → Comparison ChartPromise → objection-flip x3 → proof → ingredient list → comparisonDoes it smell; will it clog pores; is it greasy; what exactly is in it; which size and format
06. Hair growth kit (Premium)Premium Full Image → Premium Regimen Carousel → Premium Dual Image & Text → Premium Video → Premium Comparison ChartPromise → instruction (routine) → proof → demonstration → comparisonHow long until results; what order do I use these in; is it for my hair type; how do I apply it; kit or singles

Why these work

Layout 05 is the Bear Basics balm, our own brand, and the honest note is that the three objection-flips ("No scent. No fragrance masking a scent, either." and so on) were written directly from one-star reviews of competing balms. Review mining is the fastest way to find the objections that matter, and the review mining guide walks the method.

Layout 06 is the clearest case for Premium. A multi-step routine is exactly what the Regimen Carousel exists for, and a kit with an order-of-use question cannot be explained well in a static grid. If your product is a single item with no routine, Premium's advantage shrinks fast, which is the whole argument of the Premium vs Standard framework linked above.

04/12 Section

Kitchen And Cookware: Two Layouts

Kitchen objections are physical: will it fit, will it clean, will it last. The best kitchen A+ pages read like a spec sheet with pictures, and the comparison chart does more cross-sell work here than in any other category because kitchen brands tend to sell sets and sizes.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
07. Cast iron skilletImage Header with Text → Single Image with Specs Detail → Four Image & Text → Comparison Chart → Standard TextPromise → specs (dimensions) → instruction x4 → comparison (sizes) → careWill it fit my burner and oven; is it pre-seasoned; how do I care for it; 10 or 12 inch; can I put it in the dishwasher (no)
08. Glass food storage setImage & Dark Text Overlay → Three Images & Text → Single Image & Highlights → Comparison Chart → Technical SpecificationsPromise → objection-flip x3 → proof (lid seal) → comparison (piece counts) → specsDo the lids leak; will they stack; can I microwave and freeze them; which set size; exact capacities

Why these work

Both put the comparison chart fourth, after the product has been explained, and use it to sell the set rather than to fight competitors. Amazon's comparison chart module only lets you compare your own ASINs, so its real job is cross-sell. A kitchen brand with a 10-inch, 12-inch and 15-inch skillet is leaving revenue on the page if the chart is missing or buried last. The listing image stack guide covers how the main images above A+ should set up these same objections so A+ does not repeat them.

05/12 Section

Pet Products: Two Layouts

Pet shoppers buy on two questions: will my animal actually eat, wear or use this, and is it safe. The first question is emotional and answered with animals in the images. The second is rational and answered with ingredients, materials and sourcing.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
09. Dog fish oilImage Header with Text → Four Image & Text → Single Image with Specs Detail → Standard Text → Comparison ChartPromise → proof x4 (coat, joints, sourcing, pump) → dosing by weight → ingredients → comparison (bottle sizes)Will it help; where is the fish from; how much for a 60-pound dog; what else is in it; which bottle
10. Heavy-duty chew toyImage & Light Text Overlay → Three Images & Text → Single Image & Sidebar → Comparison Chart → Company LogoPromise (durability) → objection-flip x3 → proof (material, guarantee) → comparison (sizes by breed) → trustWill my dog destroy it; is the material safe if swallowed; what if it fails; which size for my breed; who makes this

Why these work

Layout 09 puts the dosing module third because weight-based dosing is the single most common pre-purchase question in pet supplements, and burying it in the Standard Text module at the bottom produces returns from people who bought the wrong bottle. Layout 10 is the only one in this set that ends with the Company Logo module, and it earns it: on a durability product with a guarantee, "who stands behind this" is a real closing objection. On most products it is not.

06/12 Section

Baby And Kids: Two Layouts

Baby is the one category where safety comes before the product promise. Parents scan for certifications, materials and age ranges before they read anything else, so the layouts below move proof up a slot compared with every other category.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
11. Silicone feeding setImage Header with Text → Single Image & Highlights → Four Image & Text → Technical Specifications → Comparison ChartPromise → proof (materials, testing) → instruction x4 → specs (age, capacity, care) → comparison (colors, sets)Is it food-grade and tested; does the suction base work; what age range; dishwasher and microwave; which set
12. Toddler learning tabletImage & Dark Text Overlay → Three Images & Text → Single Image with Specs Detail → Standard Text → Company LogoPromise → proof x3 (content, durability, parental controls) → specs → what is included → trustIs the content actually educational; will it survive being thrown; can I limit screen time; battery and storage; what comes in the box

Why these work

Both lead with proof in slot two rather than slot three or four. In every other category that ordering would be premature; in baby it matches how parents read. Certifications should be named in the module text exactly as they appear on the packaging, and nothing more, because A+ review rejects unverifiable safety claims quickly. The specifics of what gets rejected and how to rewrite it get their own guide later in this series.

07/12 Section

Apparel And Accessories: Two Layouts

Apparel returns are dominated by fit. An apparel A+ page that does not put a size and fit module near the top is going to pay for it in returns regardless of how good the lifestyle images are.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
13. Heated socksImage Header with Text → Single Image with Specs Detail → Four Image & Text → Multiple Image Module A → Standard TextPromise (warmth) → specs (battery, heat levels, run time) → instruction x4 → gallery (in use) → sizing and careHow warm and for how long; how do I charge and control them; can I wash them; what do they look like in a boot; which size
14. Kids swim apparelImage & Light Text Overlay → Single Image & Sidebar → Three Images & Text → Comparison Chart → Technical SpecificationsPromise (sun protection) → proof (UPF rating) → objection-flip x3 → comparison (sizes by age and height) → fabric specsDoes it actually block UV; will it fade or stretch; is it quick-dry; which size for a 5-year-old; what is it made of

Why these work

Layout 14 uses the comparison chart as a size chart, with each row a size ASIN and the attributes being age range, height range and chest measurement. That is an unconventional use of the module and it consistently outperforms a size chart buried in an image, because the chart is text, it is readable on mobile without pinch-zooming, and each row links to the right variation. Layout 13 puts sizing last only because heated socks are sold in fewer sizes and the battery questions dominate.

08/12 Section

Home And Decor: Two Layouts

Home shoppers need scale and context. The objection is usually "what will this look like in my space," followed by dimensions and assembly. Lifestyle images do the first job; a specs module with a human or a common object for scale does the second.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
15. Bamboo toilet paperImage Header with Text → Three Images & Text → Single Image & Highlights → Comparison Chart → Standard TextPromise (soft, sustainable) → objection-flip x3 → proof (sheet count, ply) → comparison (pack sizes, subscribe) → sourcingIs it actually soft; does it clog septic; is it more expensive per roll; which pack; where is the bamboo from
16. Scented soy candleImage & Dark Text Overlay → Four Image & Text → Single Image with Specs Detail → Multiple Image Module A → Comparison ChartPromise (scent story) → proof x4 (wax, wick, burn time, jar) → specs (size, burn hours) → gallery (in rooms) → comparison (scents)What does it smell like; is it clean-burning; how long does it last; how big is it in a room; which scent do I pick

Why these work

Layout 15's second module is three denials, and the middle one ("Safe for septic systems") came straight from the top negative review of the category leader. Layout 16 solves the scent problem, which is that you cannot smell a candle through a screen, by describing scent as a sequence (top note, heart, base) in the opener and then spending four modules on the things you can verify: wax, wick, burn time and jar. Shoppers forgive an unknowable when everything knowable is nailed down.

09/12 Section

Electronics And Gadgets: Three Layouts

Electronics objections are compatibility first, then setup, then specs. A page that opens with a spec dump loses the shopper who just wants to know if it works with their phone. A page that never gets to specs loses the shopper comparing it against three tabs.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
17. Wireless chargerImage Header with Text → Single Image & Highlights → Four Image & Text → Technical Specifications → Comparison ChartPromise → proof (compatibility list) → instruction x4 → specs (wattage, input, safety) → comparison (models)Does it work with my phone and case; how fast; does it overheat; what cable and brick; 2-in-1 or 3-in-1
18. Dash cam (Premium)Premium Full Image → Premium Video → Premium Hotspot → Premium Dual Image & Text → Premium Comparison Chart → Premium Q&APromise → demonstration (footage) → proof (feature callouts) → instruction (install) → comparison (models) → objection-flipHow good is the footage at night; what does each part do; how hard is install; which model; does it need a subscription
19. Bluetooth trackerImage & Light Text Overlay → Three Images & Text → Single Image with Specs Detail → Standard Text → Comparison ChartPromise → objection-flip x3 → specs (range, battery, water rating) → app and privacy → comparison (pack sizes)Does it work with my phone's network; what is the real range; does the battery die in a month; is my location data safe; 1, 2 or 4 pack

Why these work

Layout 17 puts a compatibility list in slot two as the proof module, with the phone models named. That single module answers the question responsible for most electronics returns. Layout 18 is Premium done right: a video module showing actual night footage answers the objection no still image can, and the Q&A module closes with the subscription question, which is the last thing a dash cam buyer checks. Layout 19 is worth noting for slot four: a Standard Text module on data privacy is dull to design and it is there because the reviews said it mattered.

10/12 Section

Outdoor, Sports And Tools: Two Layouts

These categories share a buyer who reads specs and wants to see the product under load. Durability claims need a mechanism (material, rating, test) or they read as marketing.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
20. Insulated water bottleImage Header with Text → Single Image with Specs Detail → Four Image & Text → Multiple Image Module A → Comparison ChartPromise (cold for 24h) → specs (capacity, weight, cup holder fit) → proof x4 (steel, lid, seal, finish) → gallery (use) → comparison (sizes, lids)Does it really stay cold; will it fit my cup holder; does the lid leak; does the finish chip; which size and lid
21. Cordless drill setImage & Dark Text Overlay → Technical Specifications → Four Image & Text → Single Image & Sidebar → Comparison Chart → Standard TextPromise (power) → specs (torque, voltage, chuck, battery) → instruction x4 → proof (what is in the case) → comparison (kits) → warrantyIs it strong enough for my job; exact numbers; what can I do with it; what is included; which kit; what if it breaks

Why these work

Layout 21 is the only teardown that puts Technical Specifications in slot two, and it is correct for tools because the tool buyer arrives with a number in mind (torque, voltage) and will leave if it is not immediately visible. Layout 20 leads with the cup-holder dimension in the specs module because it is the number one question in the category's reviews and nobody expects a water bottle brand to answer it. Answering the unexpected question is what earns the rest of the page a read.

11/12 Section

Food, Beverage And Toys: Four Layouts

Food and beverage objections are taste, ingredients and freshness. Toy objections are age fit, safety and whether the child will actually play with it more than once. Different categories, same principle: the unknowable (taste, fun) goes in the opener as a promise, and the knowable fills the rest.

LayoutModule OrderHeadline PatternObjection Answered
22. Specialty coffee beansImage Header with Text → Three Images & Text → Single Image & Highlights → Standard Text → Comparison ChartPromise (flavor notes) → proof x3 (origin, roast date, process) → instruction (brew guide) → sourcing story → comparison (roasts, grinds)What does it taste like; is it fresh; how do I brew it; who grew it; whole bean or ground, which roast
23. Electrolyte drink mixImage & Light Text Overlay → Single Image with Specs Detail → Four Image & Text → Comparison Chart → Standard TextPromise → specs (sodium, potassium, sugar per serving) → proof x4 (when to use) → comparison (flavors, counts) → ingredientsHow much sodium; is it sugary; when do I drink it; which flavor and count; what else is in it
24. Fidget game (ages 3+)Image Header with Text → Four Image & Text → Single Image & Sidebar → Multiple Image Module A → Comparison ChartPromise (play) → instruction x4 (how to play, four ways) → proof (materials, age, testing) → gallery (kids playing) → comparison (editions)What do you do with it; will a 3-year-old get it; is it safe; will they keep playing; which edition
25. STEM building kit (Premium)Premium Full Image → Premium Navigation Carousel → Premium Video → Premium Dual Image & Text → Premium Q&APromise → instruction (browse the builds) → demonstration → proof (learning outcomes, materials) → objection-flipWhat can you build; how hard is it; what does it look like assembled; what does it teach; what age, batteries, missing pieces

Why these work

Layout 24 spends four modules on how to play because a fidget game's failure mode is a parent who cannot explain it to the child. Layout 25's Navigation Carousel lets a shopper browse ten builds without leaving the page, which is the toy equivalent of the skincare regimen carousel: Premium earns its cost when there is a sequence or a catalog to show. Layout 22 puts roast date in the proof block because freshness is the objection coffee shoppers cannot resolve from the main images.

Free Resource

The Ecom Profit Box

Our library of ecommerce growth guides, including the listing and conversion frameworks these teardowns come from.

Get It Free
30 Minutes

Get Your A+ Page Torn Down

Send your ASIN. We will map your modules against the closest layout above and tell you which slot is wasting the click, including when the answer is that A+ is not your problem.

Book A Call
12/12 Section

What All 25 Have In Common

Strip away the categories and three patterns survive.

Slot one restates the promise, never the brand

Twenty-four of the twenty-five open with a full-width image and a promise headline. The one exception (the drill set) opens with a promise too, then goes straight to specs. None open with a logo, a founder photo or a mission statement. The Brand Story module exists for that and sits above A+ anyway.

Slot two answers the category's first doubt

Supplements: does it work and is it real. Baby: is it safe. Apparel: will it fit. Electronics: is it compatible. Tools: what are the numbers. Home: what will it look like in my space. The module type changes (proof, specs, objection-flip) but the position does not. Whatever the shopper is most likely to be worried about after the main images is what slot two is for.

The comparison chart is a cross-sell, placed after the sale

Twenty-one of the twenty-five use the comparison chart, and in nineteen of those it is in slot four or five. It is placed after the product is explained because its job is to route an already convinced shopper to the right size, flavor, pack or model. Brands that put it in slot two are asking the shopper to choose between five things they do not yet understand.

A module that does not answer a doubt is decoration. Every one of these 25 pages could lose a module and get better, and none of them could lose the second one.
The test for every slot

When A+ is not the thing to fix

Because we sell A+ design, here is the counterweight. A+ sits below the fold on mobile, below the bullets, below the price. If your main image is weak, your title is vague or your price is wrong, A+ is not going to save the listing, and a $1,500 A+ project is money that should have gone to a photo shoot or a main image test. Fix the top of the page first. A+ is for the shopper who scrolled, and that shopper is already interested; the job is to not lose them. The mobile conversion guide covers what comes before A+ in the scroll, and the graphic design service page covers what it costs if you want us to build it.

If you already have A+ live, the fastest audit is to read your page against the closest layout above and ask, for each module, which doubt it answers. Any module you cannot answer that for is the one to replace.

Key Takeaways

What To Remember

  • Order A+ modules by the shopper's objections, in the order they raise them, never by the brand story you want to tell.
  • Slot one restates the promise from the title in a full-width image; 24 of 25 layouts do exactly that, and none open with a logo.
  • Slot two answers the category's first doubt: efficacy for supplements, safety for baby, fit for apparel, compatibility for electronics, numbers for tools.
  • Three consecutive objection-flips ("not greasy," "not a sedative," "not a proprietary blend") is the most reused pattern, often written directly from competitor one-star reviews.
  • The comparison chart is a cross-sell that belongs in slot four or five; it appears in 21 of 25 layouts and only compares your own ASINs.
  • Premium A+ earns its cost when there is a sequence or a catalog to show: a skincare regimen, a set of builds, night footage. Single static products rarely need it.
  • A+ cannot fix a weak main image, title or price; if the top of the listing is broken, spend the money there first.
Sources

Where This Came From

  1. Amazon Seller Central, A+ Content Manager module list and specifications for Standard and Premium A+, as available to Brand Registered sellers. Module names in this post use Amazon's labels as of September 2026; Amazon renames modules periodically, so check the current list in Seller Central.
  2. Evolve Media Agency A+ design and audit files, 2023-2026. The 25 layouts are anonymized composites of pages we built or reviewed, grouped by category. Where an A/B result is mentioned (layout 01), it is a single Manage Your Experiments test on one listing and should be read as one observation rather than a benchmark.
  3. Bear Basics Co., our own tallow balm listing (layout 05), including the review mining that produced its objection-flip module.
  4. Evolve Media Agency, Amazon A+ Content guide and Premium vs Standard A+ decision framework, for eligibility, specs and the Premium decision.
  5. Inference note: the "three patterns" in section 12 are our reading of the 25 layouts. The counts (24 of 25, 21 of 25, 19 of 21) describe this set only and are not claims about A+ pages in general.

Questions

Twelve things brands ask before they redesign their A+ Content.
What makes a good Amazon A+ Content example?

Structure, not visuals. A good A+ page opens with a full-width module that restates the title's promise, then answers the category's objections in the order shoppers raise them, uses a comparison chart to route convinced shoppers to the right variation, and closes with usage or care instructions. Every module should answer a specific doubt. Pretty pages with modules in brand-story order underperform plain pages in objection order.

How many modules should an A+ page have?

Standard A+ allows up to seven modules and most of the 25 layouts in this post use four to six. More modules do not help if the extra ones are decorative. The right number is however many distinct objections your category raises after the main images, plus one comparison chart if you sell variations. For most single products that is five.

What should the first A+ module be?

A full-width image with a short promise headline that restates why the shopper clicked. Twenty-four of the twenty-five layouts here open that way. It should not be a company logo, founder photo or mission statement; the Brand Story module above A+ already covers who you are, and slot one is the only A+ module every shopper sees.

Where should the comparison chart go?

Slot four or five, after the product has been explained. Amazon's comparison chart only compares your own ASINs, so its job is cross-sell: routing a convinced shopper to the right size, flavor, pack or model. Placing it in slot two asks shoppers to choose between variations they do not yet understand. Twenty-one of the twenty-five layouts use it and nineteen place it late.

Is Premium A+ worth it?

When there is a sequence or a catalog to show. Skincare regimens (Regimen Carousel), multi-build toy kits (Navigation Carousel), and products where video answers an objection no still image can (dash cam night footage) all justify Premium. A single static product with three or four objections is usually served as well by Standard modules. The Premium vs Standard framework on this site covers the decision in detail.

What is an objection-flip headline?

A headline that names a fear and denies it: "Not the kind that upsets your stomach," "No scent, and no fragrance masking one." Three in a row in a Three Images & Text module is the most reused pattern in these teardowns. The fears come from competitor one-star reviews, which is why review mining is the first step of every A+ project we run.

How should supplement A+ Content be structured?

Promise in slot one, proof or objection-flips in slots two and three, dosing or specs in slot four, comparison chart in slot five, and disclosures in a Standard Text module last. Specs placed before proof get read skeptically; placed after, they read as confirmation. Keep claims to what the label says, because supplement A+ is reviewed hard.

How should apparel A+ Content handle sizing?

Use the comparison chart as a size chart, with each size ASIN as a column and age, height or chest measurement as rows. It is readable on mobile without zooming, it is text rather than an image, and each column links to the right variation. That structure outperforms a size chart baked into an image and reduces fit-related returns.

Can A+ Content fix a listing that is not converting?

Only if the top of the listing is already working. A+ sits below the fold on mobile, below the bullets and the price. If the main image is weak, the title is vague or the price is off, shoppers leave before they reach A+. Fix the main image, title and price first, test them with Manage Your Experiments, then spend on A+.

Should electronics A+ lead with specs?

Lead with compatibility, then specs. A compatibility list in slot two (phones, networks, cases) answers the objection responsible for most electronics returns. Technical Specifications belongs in slot four, after the product is explained. Tools are the exception: tool buyers arrive with a torque or voltage number in mind, so specs go in slot two there.

How do I audit my existing A+ page?

Find the closest layout in this post for your category. For each of your modules, write down the single doubt it answers. Any module you cannot do that for is decoration and should be replaced with the objection your reviews say you are missing. Then check that slot one is a promise, slot two is your category's first doubt, and the comparison chart is after the sale.

What gets A+ Content rejected?

Unverifiable claims (safety, efficacy, "best"), pricing or promotional language, references to competitors, contact information, and text in images that repeats prohibited claims. Baby and supplement pages are reviewed most strictly. Name certifications exactly as they appear on packaging and nothing more. A full guide to rejection reasons and fixes is coming later in this series.

Ian Smith, founder of Evolve Media Agency
Ian Smith
Founder, Evolve Media Agency

Ian founded Evolve Media Agency in 2017 and has spent a decade building Amazon, TikTok Shop and Shopify brands, including his own. The agency produces product photography, video, listing content, A+ design, email and AI-search visibility work for ecommerce brands in the $1M to $10M range.

Read Ian's Story

Which Slot Is Wasting Your Click?

Send your ASIN. In 30 minutes we will map your A+ page against the closest layout above, name the module that is not answering a doubt, and tell you if the fix is A+ at all.

2
Slot Two Decides It